Public health authorities and policy makers
Surveillance data, liberated into a forecast you can interrogate.
Antimicrobial-resistance surveillance is fragmented across incompatible national and international systems. Prognos ingests those sources into a single harmonised surface and forecasts trajectories with explicit uncertainty, for WHO, UKHSA, US CDC, ECDC, national NIHs, and equivalent authorities globally, with no region privileged.
Surveillance data liberation
From fragmented systems to one analytical surface
The harmonisation logic is transparent and annotated. An analyst can see exactly how two sources were reconciled, rather than trusting a black box.
Fragmented sources
- WHO GLASS90+ countries
- ECDC EARS-Net30 EU/EEA
- US CDCnational
- UKHSAnational
- Pakistan NIHnational
- ICMR Indianational
Harmonisation layer
Transparent, annotated reconciliation, not an opaque merge.
- Antibiotic-name normalisation
- Specimen-category mapping
- Breakpoint-standard tracking
- WHO AWaRe classification
Unified surface
One analytical surface
Source attribution and a data-freshness indicator preserved on every record.
Trajectory forecasting
Projections that show their uncertainty.
Resistance does not move in straight lines, and a forecast that hides its error bars is worse than none. Every Prognos projection widens its confidence interval into the future and states its data lag, so a policy maker can weigh the evidence honestly.
The workflow
From raw surveillance to a defensible brief
- 01
Ingest fragmented sources
WHO GLASS (90+ countries), ECDC EARS-Net (30 EU/EEA countries), US CDC, UKHSA, Pakistan NIH, and ICMR India arrive in incompatible formats with different conventions.
- 02
Harmonise transparently
Antibiotic-name normalisation, specimen-category mapping, breakpoint-standard tracking, and WHO AWaRe classification. Each reconciliation is annotated, not an opaque merge.
- 03
Forecast with uncertainty
Trajectories carry confidence-interval bands that widen into the future, with source attribution and a data-freshness indicator on every record.
- 04
Brief the decision
Oris assembles evidence-ranked policy briefs. The platform surfaces options; the policy maker decides. The research-only boundary is never out of view.
Evidence-ranked options. The authority decides.
The platform does not auto-execute policy or institutional actions, and it does not pretend to certainty it lacks. Where surveillance coverage is absent, it reports the gap rather than interpolating across it. The decision authority remains with the public-health professional.